Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 42 PACOMMW 30 - Davidson v. Commonwealth

Davidson v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
July 2009
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently July 2009

4 state decisions

201979198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Feller v. New Amsterdam Cas. Co. · Isenberg v. California Employment Stabilization Commission · JOHNSON v. ANGRETTI · J. Miller Co. v. Mixter · 54 Ill. 2d 311 - Clark v. Industrial Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In determining whether a relationship is one of employee-employer or independent contractor, certain factors will be considered which, while not controlling, serve as general guidance to the Court. These factors include: the control of the manner that work is to be done; responsibility for result only; terms of agreement between the parties; the nature of the work or occupation; the skill required for performance; whether one employed is engaged in a distinct occupation or business; which party supplies the tools; whether payment is by the time or by the job; whether the work is part of the regular business of the employer, and the right to terminate the employment at any time. Hammermill Paper Co. v. Rust Engineering Co., 430 Pa. 365 , 243 A.2d 389 (1968); J. Miller Co. v. Mixter, 2 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 229 , 277 A.2d 867 (1971).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.