42 So. 3d 566 - Madden v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
July 2018
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 895 So. 2d 836 - Bush v. State · 941 So. 2d 735 - Rubenstein v. State · 904 So. 2d 149 - Jones v. State · 970 So. 2d 151 - Harris v. State · 702 So. 2d 380 - Shields v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show that he acted in conformity therewith. It may, however, be admissible for other purposes such as proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hartfield v. State“sufficient to prove the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and to the exclusion of every reasonable hypothesis consistent with innocence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.