Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

42 So. 3d 837

Wooden v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2010-07-23

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently March 2019

10 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“Because the jury found that Wooden’s discharge of a firearm resulted in great bodily harm, the minimum mandatory range under section 775.087(2)(a)(3) was twenty-five years to life imprisonment. However, once the trial court imposed the minimum mandatory sentence of twenty-five years, it could not exceed the thirty year maximum penalty for a first degree felony under section 775.082(3)(b). The twenty-five year to life minimum mandatory range under section 775.087(2)(a)(3) does not create a new statutory maximum penalty of life imprisonment.”

quoted by 1 later decision, including 52 So. 3d 784 - McLeod v. State

“Contrary to the State’s argument, our decision in Mendenhall v. State, 999 So.2d 665 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008), rev. granted 26 So.3d 582 (Fla.2009) does not suggest a different result. In Menden-hall, we approved the imposition of a thirty-five year sentence on a first degree felony where the trial court also imposed a thirty-five year minimum mandatory sentence pursuant to section 775.087(2)(a)(3).”

quoted by 1 later decision, including 52 So. 3d 784 - McLeod v. State

Relies on Yasin v. State · Lyons v. Grant · 999 So. 2d 665 - Mendenhall v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2010-07-23

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

EVANDER, J.

¶1 Samuel Wooden appeals an order denying his motion to correct sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Wooden was convicted of attempted second degree murder with a firearm. The jury also found by special verdict that Wooden discharged a firearm during the commission of the crime and, as a result of the discharge, great bodily harm was inflicted on the victim. He was sentenced to fifty years imprisonment with a minimum mandatory term of twenty-five years. On appeal, he contends that the fifty year sentence exceeds the statutory penalty. We agree.

¶2 Attempted second degree murder is a second degree felony. See §§ 782.04(2), 777.04(4)(c), Fla. Stat. (2006). If the offense is committed with a firearm, the crime is reclassified to a first degree felony pursuant to section 775.087(l)(b), subject to a sentence not to exceed thirty years. See § 775.082(3)(b), Fla. Stat. (2006).

¶3 Because the jury found that Wooden’s discharge of a firearm resulted in great bodily harm, the minimum mandatory range under section 775.087(2)(a)(3) was twenty-five years to life imprisonment. However, once the trial court imposed the minimum mandatory sentence of twenty-five years, it could not exceed the thirty year maximum penalty for a first degree felony under section 775.082(3)(b). Brown v. State, 983 So.2d 706 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008). The twenty-five year to life minimum mandatory range under section 775.087(2)(a)(3) does not create a new statutory maximum penalty of life imprisonment. See Broim; Yasin v. State, 896 So.2d 875 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005). 1

¶4 On remand, the trial court is directed to correct Wooden’s sentence. Wooden does not need to be present for such proceeding.

¶5 REVERSED and REMANDED.

ORFINGER and TORPY JJ., concur.
1

¶6 . Contrary to the State's argument, our decision in Mendenhall v. State, 999 So.2d 665 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008), rev. granted, 26 So.3d 582 (Fla.2009) does not suggest a different result. In Mendenhall, we approved the imposition of a thirty-five year sentence on a first degree felony where the trial court also imposed a thirty-five year minimum mandatory sentence pursuant to section 775.087(2)(a)(3).

/42/so3d/837 · .json · Public domain