Compere v. Girand’s Empirical Analysis
1931
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently August 1977
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Schultze v. McLeary · S. Shultz & Bro. v. Lempert · Hess v. Dean · 3 Tex. Civ. App. 158 - Texas Central Railway Co. v. Rowland · 69 Tex. Crim. 275 - Summerlin v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““When a judge of the District Court is disqualified by any of the causes above stated, the parties may, by consent, appoint a proper person to try said case; or upon their failing to do so, a competent person may be appointed to try the same in the county where it is pending, in such manner as may be prescribed by law. “And the District Judges may exchange districts, or hold courts for each other when they may deem it expedient, and shall do so when required by law.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.