Helmig v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
91
cited by 91 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited
3 federal appellate · 87 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Cuyler v. Sullivan · Dennis v. Dennis · Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. Schoonejongen · Paul v. A. Levy & J. Zentner Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 91 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]o prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, [Movant] must show that his appellate counsel failed to raise a claim of error that a competent and effective lawyer would have recognized and asserted.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Evans v. State · Seals v. State“Rule 84.04(e) limits the argument portion of the brief to those errors included in the "Points Relied On." We determine only those questions stated in the points relied on. Accordingly, in addressing movant's points on appeal, we consider all arguments encompassed by each point relied on, but we do not consider arguments and issues raised in the argument portion of the brief which are not encompassed by the points relied on.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. In the Interest of T.B. · In Re Tb“something must have been done by counsel, or something must have been forgone by counsel and lost to defendant, which was detrimental to the interests of defendant and advantageous to another.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Nunley v. State · Cooper v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.