Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

42 Tex. 183

Boyden v. McClane

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1874

Texas Supreme Court · decided 1874-07-01

<p>Error from Nueces. Tried below before the Hon. T. C. Barden.</p>

Decided 1874-07-01

Devine, J.

¶1Judgment by default was entered against plaintiff in error, and in favor of McClane, in June 1873, in the District Court in Nueces County.

¶2The plaintiff in error seeks a reversal of the judgment, on the following grounds:

¶3■ “ 1. That no legal service was had upon him, of the citation, as required by law.”

¶4“ 2. The citation was served by a person purporting to be “ a ‘ special constable of precinct No. 1, of Nueces County,’ “ when no such office as special constable ’ for the purpose of “ serving citations in general, is known to, or provided for “by the law; and in rendering judgment upon such service “ by default, the court erred.”

¶5“ 3. That a special constable has no power to make service oí “ civil process, from the District Court, and in rendering judg- “ ment on such service, the court erred.”

¶6The citation was directed “ To the sheriff or any constable “ of Nueces County.”

¶7The return of service is, “ Came to hand, January 1st, 1873, “ and executed on the second day of same month, by deliver- “ ing to the within named defendant, James Boyden, in person, “ a certified copy of petition and true copy of citation.

¶8“ Jos. E. Fitzimmons,

¶9Special constable, Precinct No. 1, Nueces Co., Texas,

¶10“ Corpus Christi, Texas.”

¶11A special constable may be appointed in cases of emergency by any justice of the peace (Art. 6312, 2d Vol. Pas. Dig.); such person can execute any process civil or criminal. No power is given, however, for such constable to serve citations or execute process in civil causes pending in the District Courts. When the office of sheriff is vacant, or when the sheriff *185is a party to, or interested in any suit pending in the courts of this county, or where an affidavit shall be filed with the cleric of the court of the partiality, prejudice, consanguinity, or affinity of the sheriff of the county where suit is brought, or to be brought, the cleric may issue and direct the process to any constable of the county, who shall serve the same in like manner as the sheriff should do (Pas. Dig., 995 and 996). Pnder sections 18 and 21 of article 5 of the constitution, any constable of the county is authorized to execute any process where the sheriff is from any cause incompetent to execute the same. There is nothing however in either of the statutes, or sections of the constitution referred to, that can be construed as authorizing a person styling himself a.special constable to execute civil process issuing from the District Court.

¶12The service not being made by an officer authorized by the law, the judgment is reversed, and cause is remanded.

¶13Reversed and remanded.

/42/tex/183 · .json · Public domain