Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 42 Tex. Crim. 353 - Jacobs v. State

42 Tex. Crim. 353 - Jacobs v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1900

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 1916
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We have also held that where there is a conflict in the testimony and the witness is a stranger his testimony may be supported in the same way.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.