Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

42 U.S.C. § 2000E

Section 2000e · Other unlawful employment practices

This is § 704 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Amended 2 times on record

Applied in 5,029 court decisions — leading case Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. White (2006)

Most recently applied in Christensen v. Labor Commission (November 2025)

Applied most in the District Circuit Circuit (399 decisions)

Cases citing this section usually also cite 42 U.S.C. § 2000E · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E

How often courts cite this section

19641970198019902000201020173088-352enacted · 1964 · 88-35292-261amended · 1972 · 92-261Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Whiteleading · 2006 · Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. White
citing decisions per year

Court decisions citing this, by year.Markers show enactment, consequential amendments, and circuit splits over this section — watch for a citation surge after a change or a disagreement. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.

(a) Discrimination for making charges, testifying, assisting, or participating in enforcement proceedings

It shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employer to discriminate against any of his employees or applicants for employment, for an employment agency, or joint labor-management committee controlling apprenticeship or other training or retraining, including on-the-job training programs, to discriminate against any individual, or for a labor organization to discriminate against any member thereof or applicant for membership, because he has opposed any practice made an unlawful employment practice by this subchapter, or because he has made a charge, testified, assisted, or participated in any manner in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing under this subchapter.

(b) Printing or publication of notices or advertisements indicating prohibited preference, limitation, specification, or discrimination; occupational qualification exception

It shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employer, labor organization, employment agency, or joint labor-management committee controlling apprenticeship or other training or retraining, including on-the-job training programs, to print or publish or cause to be printed or published any notice or advertisement relating to employment by such an employer or membership in or any classification or referral for employment by such a labor organization, or relating to any classification or referral for employment by such an employment agency, or relating to admission to, or employment in, any program established to provide apprenticeship or other training by such a joint labor-management committee, indicating any preference, limitation, specification, or discrimination, based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin, except that such a notice or advertisement may indicate a preference, limitation, specification, or discrimination based on religion, sex, or national origin when religion, sex, or national origin is a bona fide occupational qualification for employment.

Editorial notes U.S. Code · Office of the Law Revision Counsel

Amendments

1972—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 92–261, §8(c)(1), inserted provision making it an unlawful employment practice for a joint labor-management committee controlling apprenticeship or other training or retraining, including on-the-job training programs, to discriminate against the specified individuals.

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 92–261, §8(c)(2), inserted provisions making prohibitions applicable to joint labor-management committees controlling apprenticeship or other training or retraining, including on-the-job training programs, and notices or advertisements of such joint labor-management committees relating to admission to, or employment in, any program established to provide apprenticeship or other training.

/42/usc/2000-e-3 · .json · Public domain