Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 42 Wash. 142 - Murphy v. Murphy

Murphy v. Murphy’s Empirical Analysis

1906

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
March 2020
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently March 2020

11 state decisions

701906191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Fretwell v. McLemore · Griffin v. Warburton · Flood v. Pilgrim · Granger v. Harriman · Succession of Graves

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘The rights of creditors to the assets of a deceased person is the principal reason for requiring official administration, and courts, therefore, sanction the disposition of the property of a decedent without the appointment of an administrator where it is certain that no debts are owing.’ ””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.