42 Wash. 2d 494 - State v. Tharp’s Empirical Analysis
1953
Citation profile
36 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently June 2021 · most notably State v. Clark (2001), 101 Wash. 2d 745 - State v. Laureano (1984)
36 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Hunter · State v. Lloyd · State v. Patterson · Rich v. Campbell · State v. Crossman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is to enable the parties to learn the state of mind of the prospective jurors, so that they can know whether or not any of them may be subject to a challenge for cause, and determine the advisability of interposing their peremptory challenges.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[T]he defendant should be permitted to examine prospective jurors carefully, 'and to an extent which will afford him every reasonable protection.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Being a matter of procedure, the omission of the voir dire oath was, at most, a trial error. If he intended to rely upon it on appeal, defendant should have urged it to the trial court as soon as he discovered it. ... Defendant’s failure to submit it to the trial court timely, bars our consideration of it as possible error. Otherwise, he could take advantage of any error which he, in fact, invited by permitting it to inhere in his trial unchallenged until after the verdict.[ 52 ]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hyder
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.