State v. Hampton’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 79 Wash. 2d 12 - State Ex Rel. Carroll v. Junker · 102 Wash. 2d 68 - Davis v. Globe MacHine Manufacturing Co. · 93 Wash. 2d 454 - State v. Dailey · State v. Jackschitz · United States v. Miller
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If a bond be given and execution stayed, as provided in RCW 10.19.100, and the person for whose appearance such recognizance was given shall be produced in court before the expiration of said period of sixty days, the judge may vacate such judgment upon such terms as may be just and equitable, otherwise execution shall forthwith issue as well against the sureties in the new bond as against the judgment debtors.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Kramer · State v. Kramer“The State contends that since [the surety] did not seek a stay of execution under RCW 10.19.100, the court did not abuse its discretion in denying [the surety's] motion to vacate the forfeiture. The State would have the court read RCW 10.19.105 as stating that requesting a stay of execution under RCW 10.19.100 is a prerequisite to subsequent ability to challenge the forfeiture. RCW 10.19.100 was intended to provide the surety with temporary relief from the harshness of forfeiture. It is not a prerequisite for later relief As was held in [ Jackschitz, 76 Wash. 253 , 136 P. 132 ], the provisions of RCW 10.19.105, then Rem. & Ball.Code § 2233, are not to be construed as limiting the common law power of the court to vacate a forfeiture of bail even after the expiration of the 60-day period. Jackschitz, [ 76 Wash. at 256 , 136 P. 132 ]. Though [the surety's] motion to vacate was made more than 60 days after the order of forfeiture, [the surety] properly sought redress.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Kramer“abide by and perform all orders and judgments of said court . . . and not depart from said court without leave of said court until discharged by due course of law . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.