State v. Ekkelkamp’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 99 Wash. 2d 582 - Bender v. City of Seattle · 19 Wash. App. 256 - State v. Jury · 40 Wash. 2d 92 - State v. Rousseau · 35 Wash. App. 13 - State v. Hoffman · 36 Wash. App. 205 - State v. Goree
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The Legislature's concerns for imposing the two conditions appear to be that an arrestee be advised of the authority and reason for his arrest at the earliest time following his arrest. Here, Dugger was told that he was being arrested on the authority of a warrant for his arrest, and he seems to have been aware of the reason behind the issuance of that warrant. We find that the arresting officers sufficiently complied with the statute to have accomplished its purposes.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.