Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 42 Wash. App. 611 - Gerimonte v. Case

42 Wash. App. 611 - Gerimonte v. Case’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
September 2012
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 103 Wash. 2d 768 - Hartley v. State · 55 Wash. 2d 678 - Preston v. Duncan · 2 Wash. App. 348 - McCutcheon v. Brownfield · 19 Wash. App. 35 - State v. Lewis · 27 Wash. App. 247 - Peters v. Skalman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) Undue influence is unfair persuasion of a party who is under the domination of the person exercising the persuasion or who by virtue of the relation between them is justified in assuming that that person will not act in a manner inconsistent with his welfare. (2) If a party’s manifestation of assent is induced by undue influence by the other party, the contract is voidable by the victim. (3) If a party’s manifestation of assent is induced by one who is not a party to the transaction, the contract is voidable by the victim unless the other party to the transaction in good faith and without reason to know of the undue influence either gives value or relies materially on the transaction. Comment: b. Unfair persuasion. . . . The degree of persuasion that is unfair depends on a variety of circumstances. The ultimate question is whether the result was produced by means that seriously impaired the free and competent exercise of judgment. Such factors as the unfairness of the resulting bargain, the unavailability of independent advice, and the susceptibility of the person persuaded are circumstances to be taken into account in determining whether there was unfair persuasion, but they are not in themselves controlling.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.