Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 42 Wis. 2d 615 - Blackwell v. State

42 Wis. 2d 615 - Blackwell v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
November 1990
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently November 1990

22 state decisions

1801969197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 41 Wis. 2d 552 - Strait v. State · 14 Wis. 2d 119 - Johns v. State · Dascenzo v. State · 40 Wis. 2d 213 - State v. Cartagena

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If you are satisfied from all of the evidence in this case beyond a reasonable doubt that at the time and place so mentioned in the information and referred to, that the defendant did sell Heroin, then it is your duty to find the defendant guilty in the said manner and form as charged in the information. If you are not so satisfied from all of the evidence in this case beyond a reasonable doubt, then it is your duty to find him not guilty.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “If the court grants a motion to dismiss based upon a defect in the indictment, information or complaint, or in the institution of the proceedings, it may order that the defendant be held in custody or that his bail be continued for not more than 72 hours pending issuance of a new summons or warrant or the filing of a new indictment, information or complaint.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “identification instructions should be encouraged in narcotics-undercover agent cases.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.