McNellis v. Raymond’s Empirical Analysis
420 F.2d 51 · 1970
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably Rubin Usn v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co M (1981), Klein v. Tabatchnick (1979)
8 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 110
Relies on Commissioner v. Estate of Bosch · Knetzer v. Schultz · Phillip J. McNellis as Trustee of Donald S. Potter, Bankrupt v. First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Rochester, New York,defendant-Appellee · Larrimer v. Feeney · Austrian v. Williams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(T)he form of a transaction may be controlling for one purpose, but not for another. Here, while the corporate veil may not be pierced in determining whether the loans were usurious, the corporation and the men behind may be recognized as one for the purpose of repayment”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.