Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 420 F.2d 607 - Roland E. Matthews, Jr. v. Kenneth L. Hardy

Roland E. Matthews, Jr. v. Kenneth L. Hardy’s Empirical Analysis

420 F.2d 607 · 1970

Citation profile

49
cited by 49 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
6
states following
June 1997
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 4 district · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 49 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 1997 · most notably Humphrey v. Cady (1972), Campbell v. McGruder (1978)

22 federal appellate · 4 district · 12 state decisions

450197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bolling v. Sharpe · Johnson v. Avery · Baxstrom v. Herold · Scales v. United States · Bolton v. Harris

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Any person while serving sentence of any court of the District of Columbia for crime, in a District of Columbia penal institution, and who, in the opinion of the Director of the Department of Corrections of the District of Columbia, is mentally ill, shall be referred by such Director to the psychiatrist functioning under section 24-106, and if such psychiatrist certifies that the person is mentally ill, this shall be sufficient to authorize the Director to transfer such person to a hospital for the mentally ill to receive care and treatment during the continuance of his mental illness.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.