Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 420 F.2d 795 - Meadows v. United States

Meadows v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

420 F.2d 795 · 1969

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
2
states following
December 1989
most recently cited

40 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently December 1989 · most notably 3 Cal. 3d 404 - In Re Johnson (1970), United States v. Liguori (1970)

40 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

450196919701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 4401 · 26 U.S.C. § 4411 · 26 U.S.C. § 5841 (§ 201 of the Gun Control Act of 1968) · 26 U.S.C. § 5851 (§ 201 of the Gun Control Act of 1968)

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Katz v. United States · Johnson v. Zerbst · Gideon v. Wainwright · United States v. Wade

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “to ensure the accuracy of the determination of guilt, or to correct an abuse that endangers 'the very integrity of the fact-finding process,'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.