United States v. Auerbach’s Empirical Analysis
420 F.2d 921 · 1969
Citation profile
28 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2021 · most notably United States v. Loud Hawk (1986), United States v. Marcello (1970)
28 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · Klopfer v. State of North Carolina · United States v. Debrow · Linkletter v. Walker · Wilson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Having sought the aid of the judicial process and realizing the deliberateness that a court employs in reaching a decision, the defendants are not now able to criticize the very process which they so frequently called upon.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The defendants' assertion that the failure to demand the right to a speedy trial should not constitute a waiver of that right is not to be lightly dismissed. A waiver of one's constitutional right cannot be inferred from a silent record, and the courts must indulge in every reasonable presumption against a waiver of a fundamental constitutional right. Johnson v. Zerbst, 1930, 304 U.S. 458 , 58 S.Ct. 1019, 82 L.Ed. 1461. See Klopfer v. North Carolina, 1967, 386 U.S. 213 , 87 S.Ct. 988, 18 L.Ed.2d 1.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Murray v. Wainwright
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.