Vann v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
420 F.2d 968 · 1970
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 57 later decisions — most recently August 2019 · most notably Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. United States (1987), La Crosse Garment Manufacturing Co. v. United States (1970)
2 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 41 U.S.C. § 321
Relies on United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co. · United States v. Blair ex rel. Roanoke Marble & Granite Co. · United States v. Anthony Grace & Sons, Inc. · United States v. Joseph A. Holpuch Co. · Koppers Co. v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is the rule that a contractor who knows or should have known the facts of the conditions at the site is estopped to claim a changed condition. Where he knows or has opportunity to learn the facts, he is unable to prove ... that he was misled by the contract.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“in Rule 15(c) is whether the general fact situation or the aggregate of the operative facts underlying the claim for relief in the first petition gave notice to the government of the new matter). We agree with Intrepid that, at the time of the February complaint, the government was on notice that Intrepid sought to contest the ITA's scope ruling. We disagree with the trial court and the government that the statute of limitations would have to be”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.