Abdus-Samad v. Bell’s Empirical Analysis
420 F.3d 614 · 2005
Citation profile
21 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently August 2021 · most notably Bland v. Sirmons (2006), Getsy v. Mitchell (2007)
21 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Chapman v. State of California · Boykin v. Alabama · Williams v. Taylor · Coleman v. Thompson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A claim is exhausted if the state court addressed the substance of the asserted claim.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Bland v. Sirmons
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.