Barnes v. Briley’s Empirical Analysis
420 F.3d 673 · 2005
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently April 2020 · most notably McCready v. eBay, Inc. (2006), County of McHenry v. Insurance Co. of the West (2006)
14 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Perez v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections · Walker v. Thompson · Lee v. City of Chicago · Strong v. David
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“filed his original complaint alleging properly exhausted claims ... under the FTCA. After an investigation by his newly appointed counsel revealed that the circumstances underlying his original complaint supported different claims against different defendants, [plaintiff] initiated the prison grievance process, as required by the PLRA. Once he had exhausted those administrative remedies, [plaintiff] dismissed his FTCA claims and, with the district court’s leave, substituted his § 1983 claims against the ... defendants. It is evident, therefore, that [the plaintiff] did not attempt to replead improperly exhausted claims in his amended complaint. Rather, he asserted properly exhausted FTCA claims in his original complaint, and later he raised new, properly exhausted § 1983 claims against new defendants.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Rhodes v. Robinson“in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, taking as true all well-pleaded factual allegations and making all possible inferences from those allegations in his or her favor.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“`appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.