Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 420 F.3d 880 - Barstad v. Murray County

Barstad v. Murray County’s Empirical Analysis

420 F.3d 880 · 2005

Citation profile

63
cited by 63 later decisions
November 2021
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 11 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 63 later decisions — most recently November 2021 · most notably Cordi-Allen v. Conlon (2007), Del Marcelle v. Brown County Corp. (2012)

21 federal appellate · 11 district ·

430200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1985 · 42 U.S.C. § 1986

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · City of Cleburne Texas v. Cleburne Living Center · Carnegie-Mellon University v. Cohill

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Summary judgment is appropriate only if there are no genuine issues of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “viewing all evidence and reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[i]dentifying the disparity in treatment is especially important in class-of-one cases.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.