Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 420 FAPPX 91 - Wavercak v. Astrue

Wavercak v. Astrue’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
March 2019
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Schaal v. Apfel · Carroll v. Secretary of Health & Human Services · Halloran v. Barnhart · Balsamo v. Chater · Patricia MacHadio v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “does not undermine the credibility assessment [if there is] substantial evidence supporting the ALJ's [credibility] determination.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Ecklund v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. · Rousey v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.
  2. “the ALJ was well-aware of [his] 17-year employment ... and considered this in the disability analysis when he concluded that [his] RFC for light work prevented him from performing the medium demands of his past [work].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Rousey v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.
  3. “Although it is true that a good work history may be deemed probative of credibility, it remains just one of many factors appropriately considered in assessing credibility.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Rousey v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.