Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 420 MASS 675 - Commonwealth v. Jung

Commonwealth v. Jung’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

41 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably Commonwealth v. Vinnie (1998), Commonwealth v. Magee (1996)

41 state decisions

150199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Oregon v. Mathiason · Burdeau v. McDowell · Michigan v. Tyler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"(1) the place of the interrogation; (2) whether the officers have conveyed to the person being questioned any belief or opinion that the person is a suspect; (3) the nature of the interrogation, including whether the interview was aggressive or, instead, informal and influenced in its contours by the person being interviewed; and (4) whether, at the time the incriminating statement was made, the person was free to end the interview by leaving the locus of the interrogation or by asking the interrogator to leave, as evidenced by whether the interview terminated with an arrest."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “questioning initiated by law enforcement officers after a person has been taken * into custody or otherwise deprived of his freedom of action in any significant way.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.