Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 420 Md. 339 - Hannah v. State

Hannah v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
5
states following
November 2024
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 21 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Erickson v. United States · United States v. Giese · King v. State · United States v. Foster · MEDICAL MUTUAL LIABILITY INS. SOC. OF MARYLAND v. Evans

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the defendant may be forced to choose between testifying in her or his own defense with the risk of being convicted by the jury's misuse of impeachment evidence as propensity evidence, on one hand, and not testifying and foregoing a defense, on the other.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Evidence is prejudicial when it tends to have some adverse effect ... beyond tending to prove the fact or issue that justified its admission.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “had no tendency to prove any issue other than ... [that the defendant] was a violent thug”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.