State v. Pete’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently September 2004
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Blockburger v. United States · William Garland v. State of Washington · Maloy v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of West Palm Beach · Ransom v. Haner · United States v. Pruitt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In light of the fact that the two offenses were really part of one general transaction involving the unlawful sale of liquor, we believe the judgment of conviction should be modified so as to limit appellee's sentences to the term of imprisonment that he has now served.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Mutschler v. State · Bear v. State“the basis for, and instances when, review of criminal sentences is obtainable in our court system.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Bear v. State“unduly harsh and that the sentence should be reduced.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bear v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.