Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 420 P3D 568 - State v. Martinez

State v. Martinez’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
September 2023
most recently cited

1 district · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Calandra · Costello v. United States · State v. Rowell · Buzbee v. Donnelly · In re Morgan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “recognize[d] that ... judicial subpoenas issued unilaterally by the deputy district attorney in the absence of any pending court or grand jury proceeding [are] unlawful.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “it is unlawful for a court or an officer of the court to issue any subpoena in the absence of a pending judicial action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “pending prosecution, court action, or grand jury proceeding,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.