Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 420 PASUPER 588 - Commonwealth v. Mercado

Commonwealth v. Mercado’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
September 1997
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Fortune · Commonwealth v. MacOlino · Commonwealth v. Valette · Commonwealth v. TIRPAK · Commonwealth v. Keblitis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The existence of an agreement ... need not be express, but rather, may be inferred from the surrounding circumstances. An agreement can be inferred from a variety of circumstances including, but not limited to, the relation between the parties, knowledge of and participation in the crime, and the circumstances and conduct of the parties surrounding the criminal episode. These factors may coalesce to establish a conspiratorial agreement beyond a reasonable doubt where one factor alone might fail.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.