Sweeney v. Sweeney’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 223
Relies on Glasscock v. Glasscock · Lewis v. Lewis · Simmons v. Simmons · E.D.M. v. T.A.M. · Edm v. Tam
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the current and reasonably anticipated earnings of both spouses.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Sweeney v. Sweeney
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.