Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 420 SO2D 1105 - State v. Duncan

State v. Duncan’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

503
cited by 503 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

503 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 503 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably 433 So. 2d 688 - State v. Smith (1983), State Ex Rel. Graffagnino v. King (1983)

503 state decisions

17701982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Aguilar v. Texas · State v. Sepulvado · 393 So. 2d 1212 - State v. Moody · 337 So. 2d 1177 - State v. Marks

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 503 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “when the facts and circumstances within the affiant's knowledge, and of which he has reasonably trustworthy information, are sufficient to support a reasonable belief that evidence or contraband may be found at the place to be searched.”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “While the trial judge need not articulate every aggravating and mitigating circumstance outlined in art. 894.1, the record must reflect that he adequately considered these guidelines in particularizing the sentence to the defendant.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “"This is the sentence which [the defendant] could be sentenced to, as much as twelve years at hard labor. The court at this time, because of the man's previous problems with drugs and because of the seriousness of this crime and because the court believes if he were released on probation that he would involve himself in other criminal activity and because any lesser sentence would deprecate the seriousness of the crime. The court hereby sentences the defendant... to serve at hard labor for a term of three years."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.