Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 420 SO2D 303 - State v. Rickard

State v. Rickard’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
3
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably 934 So. 2d 1263 - Tillman v. State (2006), Hoffman v. People (1989)

31 state decisions

1901982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Katz v. United States · Payton v. New York · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Rakas v. Illinois · Sedillo v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'preintrusion.' Here the officer is located outside of a -5- constitutionally protected area and is looking inside that area. If the officer observes contraband in this situation, it only furnishes him probable cause to seize the item. He must either obtain a warrant or have some exception to the warrant requirement before he may enter the protected area and seize the contraband”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “We answer the certified question as follows: Where contraband is seen in plain view by police in the defendant's backyard from a point adjacent to the property and the defendant has exhibited an actual expectation of privacy, the police may not seize the contraband without a warrant in the absence of exigent circumstances. [Emphasis supplied.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[PJrivacy should be recognized in areas where a person has exhibited an actual expectation of privacy, if society recognizes that expectation as reasonable.... The defendant in the present case exhibited an actual expectation of privacy by putting the marijuana behind a shed and erecting a plywood partition to obstruct the neighbor’s view.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.