Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 420 So. 2d 853 - Hopper v. State

420 So. 2d 853 - Hopper v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 1996
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · 411 So. 2d 824 - Sheehan v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[T]here is nothing in the federal or state constitution which suggest[s] that a defendant has a right to receive concurrent sentences for multiple offenses ... “ ... ‘The most basic logic and reflection make it apparent that separate offenses merit separate punishments.’... [[Image here]] “... The fact that the trial judge failed to inform the appellant of the possibilities of consecutive sentences does not vitiate the voluntariness of his guilty plea.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.