Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

420 So. 2d 923

Docket No. 82-18.

Ortiz v. State

Alfredo ORTIZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 22, 1982.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1982-10-22

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently February 1984

4 state decisions

Relies on Brown v. State · 407 So. 2d 641 - Quinn v. City of Pompano Beach · 419 So. 2d 695 - Ivory v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1982-10-22

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1*924 Jerry Hill, Public Defender, and Paul C. Helm, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

¶2Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Ann G. Paschall, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4After reviewing the briefs and record on appeal in this case, we find that the appellant has failed to demonstrate any reversible error, and therefore the judgments and sentences appealed from are affirmed. However, that portion of the judgment ordering the appellant to pay court costs totaling $740 and $10 to the Crimes Compensation Trust Fund is stricken because the appellant was insolvent at the time of sentencing. Ivory v. State,419 So.2d 695 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982); Brown v. State,400 So.2d 510 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981); Engle v. State,407 So.2d 641 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981).

¶5BOARDMAN, A.C.J., and SCHEB and RYDER, JJ., concur.

/420/so2d/923 · .json · Public domain