Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 420 U.S. 1 - Chapman v. Meier

Chapman v. Meier’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

683
cited by 683 later decisions
72
cited 72 times by the Supreme Court
18
states following
November 2025
most recently cited

156 federal appellate · 86 district · 64 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 683 later decisions (72 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2025 · most notably City of Mobile v. Bolden (1980), Maher v. Roe (1977)

156 federal appellate · 86 district · 64 state decisions — followed in 18 states

1790197519801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Baker v. Carr · Reynolds v. Sims · Wesberry v. Sanders · White v. Regester · Whitcomb v. Chavis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 683 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “unless there are persuasive justifications, a court-ordered reapportionment plan of a state legislature must avoid use of multimember districts, and, as well, must ordinarily achieve the goal of population equality with little more than de minimis variation.”
    17 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “reapportionment is primarily the duty and responsibility of the State through its legislature or other body, rather than of a federal court.”
    11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “We believe that a population deviation of [20 percent] in a court-ordered plan is constitutionally impermissible in the absence of significant state policies or other acceptable considerations that require adoption of a plan with so great a variance.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.