Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 420 U.S. 31 - Daniel v. Louisiana

Daniel v. Louisiana’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

464
cited by 464 later decisions
31
cited 31 times by the Supreme Court
19
states following
October 2013
most recently cited

71 federal appellate · 5 district · 296 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 464 later decisions (31 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2013 · most notably Batson v. Kentucky (1986), Teague v. Lane (1989)

71 federal appellate · 5 district · 296 state decisions — followed in 19 states

297019751980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Stovall v. Denno · Johnson v. State of New Jersey · Duncan v. State of Louisiana · Linkletter v. Walker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 464 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “convictions obtained by juries empaneled prior to the date of [Taylor ].”
    11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the fair cross section requirement '[does] not rest on the premise that every criminal trial, or any particular trial, [is] necessarily unfair because it [is] not conducted in accordance with [Taylor ],'”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[T]he American concept of the jury trial contemplates a jury drawn from a fair cross section of the community.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.