Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 420 U.S. 714 - Oregon v. Hass

Oregon v. Hass’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

2,214
cited by 2,214 later decisions
105
cited 105 times by the Supreme Court
48
states following
August 2025
most recently cited

343 federal appellate · 64 district · 1,478 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 2,214 later decisions (105 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2025 · most notably Illinois v. Gates (1983), United States v. Leon (1984)

343 federal appellate · 64 district · 1,478 state decisions — followed in 48 states

8370197519801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Sibron v. State of New York Peters · United States v. Calandra · California v. Green · Wisconsin v. Yoder

Cited together with Harris v. New York · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Walder v. United States · Mincey v. Arizona · United States v. Havens

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2,214 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(T)he shield provided by Miranda is not to be perverted to a license to testify inconsistently, or even perjuriously, free from the risk of confrontation with prior inconsistent utterances.”
    48 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “may not impose such greater restrictions as a matter of federal constitutional law when this Court specifically refrains from imposing them.”
    20 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(t)he shield provided by Miranda cannot be perverted into a license to use perjury by way of a defense . . . .”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.