Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 421 A2D 563 - State v. Verdirome

State v. Verdirome’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
3
states following
September 2000
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently September 2000

5 state decisions

30198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bell v. Burson · Wuchter v. Pizzutti · Balch Pontiac-Buick, Inc. v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles · Hartley v. Vitiello · State v. Tedesco

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “personal service of a notice of suspension but provide[d] that a notice forwarded by registered or certified mail to the address for the person registered as owner or operator of any motor vehicle as shown by the records of the commissioner shall be sufficient notice to such person that the certificate of registration or operator's license is revoked or under suspension.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he constitutional requirement is not, however, that notice be actually delivered to the person involved, but that the statutory procedure for giving notice create a reasonable probability that he will receive actual notice. . . . We think the provision for notice by registered or certified mail adequately CT Page 11844 fulfills this requirement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.