Kay v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
421 F.2d 1007 · 1970
Citation profile
34 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently October 2000 · most notably Japanese Electronic Products Antitrust Litigation v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co Ltd (1983), Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. (1983)
34 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Glasser v. United States · Bruton v. United States · Krulewitch v. United States · Turner v. United States · Grunewald v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The admissions and statements of a co-defendant are admissible as against the other even in the absence of a conspiracy count where there is independent evidence of a concert of action.” (Emphasis added by Val-divia.)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.