United States v. Clutterbuck’s Empirical Analysis
421 F.2d 485 · 1970
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2311 (Anti Car Theft Act of 1992) · 18 U.S.C. § 2314 · 18 U.S.C. § 641 (Livestock Fraud Protection Act)
Relies on Killian v. United States · United States v. Sheridan · Lovell Manufacturing Co. v. Etten · Baker v. Carr · Herman v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; but if the value of such property does not exceed the sum of $100, he shall be fined not more than $1,000 or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the word 'value' means face, par, or market value, or cost price, either wholesale or retail, whichever is greater.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“so far as the Government [was] concerned there [was] no longer anything to which [the] 'cost price' [could] relate.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.