Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 421 F.2d 600 - United States v. Williams

United States v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

421 F.2d 600 · 1970

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
July 2022
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 50 U.S.C. § 3811

Relies on Boyce Motor Lines, Inc. v. United States · Gutknecht v. United States · Graves v. United States · United States v. Rabb · United States v. Hoffman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The defendant’s failure to receive the notice to report is shown by the Selective Service record. The fact that such nonreceipt was the result of noncompliance with the duty to keep the Board advised of his address is immaterial because such noncompliance is another offense, [emphasis added]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “To knowingly fail to perform a duty a person must be aware of the duty and deliberately or wilfully neglect to perform it. United States v. Williams, 421 F.2d 600 , 602 (10th Cir. 1970).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.