Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 421 F.2d 928 - Tritt v. United States

Tritt v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

421 F.2d 928 · 1970

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
3
states following
July 1999
most recently cited

26 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently July 1999 · most notably United States v. Radetsky (1976), United States v. Henry (1980)

26 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

270197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 321 (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 331 (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act)

Relies on Russell v. United States · Hartman v. United States · Wyatt v. United States · Flores v. United States · United States v. Rowlette

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an indictment * * founded on a general provision defining the elements of an offense, * * *, need not negative the matter of an exception made by a proviso or other distinct clause, whether in the same section or elsewhere and * * * it is incumbent upon one who relies on such an exception to set it up and establish it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.