United States v. Strobehn’s Empirical Analysis
421 F.3d 1017 · 2005
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113 · 18 U.S.C. § 924
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · United States v. Nobles · Smith v. United States · Bifulco v. United States · Crandon v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[f]ederal common law assumes that private communications between spouses are intended to be confidential, and thus privileged”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.