United States v. Lindquist’s Empirical Analysis
421 F.3d 751 · 2005
Citation profile
23 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924
Relies on United States v. Booker · Shepard v. United States · United States v. Mashek · United States v. Marcussen · United States v. Hadash
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]t would be unreasonable ... to allow the 'additional felony' to be an offense that the defendant has to commit, in every case, in order to commit the underlying offense”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[i]f the defendant ... used or possessed any firearm or ammunition in connection with another felony offense ... increase by 4 levels.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Iowa’s statute for operating a vehicle without the owner’s consent is analogous to Missouri’s auto theft without consent statute. Compare Iowa Code § 714.7 (“Any person who shall take possession or control of any ... vehicle ... without the consent of the owner of such, but without the intent to permanently deprive the owner thereof ....”) with Mo. Rev.Stat. § 570.030 (“A person commits the crime of stealing if he or she appropriates property ... of another with the purpose to deprive him or her thereof ... without his or her consent....”). Iowa’s statute and the Missouri statute discussed in Williams are sufficiently similar such that the decision in Williams controls this case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.