United States v. Ehrmann’s Empirical Analysis
421 F.3d 774 · 2005
Citation profile
19 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · United States v. Booker · United States v. Olano · Batson v. Kentucky · Blakely v. Washington
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`To obtain a reversal for prosecutorial misconduct, the defendant must show that (1) the prosecutor's remarks were improper, and (2) such remarks prejudiced the defendant's rights in obtaining a fair trial.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the fairness, integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“a reasonable, articulable suspicion that criminal activity”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.