421 F. Supp. 107 - Jamerson v. Miles’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently May 1996
8 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1601 (§ 102 of the Truth in Lending Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 1635 (§ 125 of the Truth in Lending Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 1640 (§ 130 of the Truth in Lending Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1337
Relies on Sohn v. Waterson · Sosa v. Fite · Littlefield v. Walt Flanagan & Co. · Bill Hoover v. Oklahoma Turnpike Authority · Larter & Sons, Inc. v. Dinkler Hotels Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Although the general rule is that a true statute of limitations extinguishes only the right to enforce the remedy and not the substantive right itself, the limitation of time for commencing an action under a statute creating a new right enters into and becomes a part of the right of action itself and is a limitation not only of the remedy but of the right also; the right to recover depends upon the commencement of the action within the time limit set by the statute, and if that period of time is allowed to elapse without the institution of the action, the right of the action is gone forever. (Emphasis added).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“This subsection does not bar a person from asserting a violation of this subchapter in an action to collect the debt which was brought more than one year from the date of the occurrence of the violation as a matter of defense by recoupment or set-off in such action, except as otherwise provided by State Law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“An obligor's right of rescission shall expire three years after the date of consummation of the transaction . . . notwithstanding the fact that the disclosures required under this section or any other material disclosures required under this part have not been delivered to the obligor.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.