Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 421 MASS 694 - Commonwealth v. Leitzsey

Commonwealth v. Leitzsey’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
November 2016
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently November 2016

10 state decisions

70199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Taylor v. Louisiana · Duren v. Missouri · Opinions of the Justices to the House of Representatives · Commonwealth v. Wright · Cecil v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “in the community; . . . that the representation of this group in venires . . . is not fair and reasonable in relation to the number of such persons in the community; and . . . that this underrepresentation is due to systematic exclusion of the group in the jury-selection process'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he procedure used in this Commonwealth to choose jury panels from lists of qualified jurors is random selection. . . . Inevitably, some panels drawn by this method will fail to represent proportionately various groupings in the population.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[T]o prove that a petit jury selection process infringes a defendant's constitutional right to be tried by a jury representative of a fair cross section of the community, the defendant must show 'that the group alleged to be excluded is a”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.