State v. Traczyk’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently March 2009
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bridwell v. United States · State v. Paradise · Head v. Special School District No. 1 · Knopp v. Gutterman · Cooper v. Watson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]hat distinction justifies any departures from the general rule that has arisen involving Minn.Stat. § 645.21, but because that distinction is absent from legislation regulating criminal law, we feel constrained to not extend that exception to the interpretation of the retroactivity issue in criminal cases.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wschola v. Snyder“[traditionally, consistent with the mandate of Minn.Stat. § 645.21, we have required clear evidence of retroactive intent before applying statutes retroactively with one notable exception in the area of worker’s compensation law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“No law shall be construed to be retroactive unless clearly and manifestly so intended by the legislature.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.