Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 421 P3D 35 - Riddle v. Lanser

Riddle v. Lanser’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
September 2024
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on University of Texas v. Camenisch · Jenkins v. Handel · Demoski v. New · Fernandes v. Portwine · Alderman v. Iditarod Properties, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “adopt the rule of law that is most persuasive in light of precedent, reason, and policy.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “exists if an award is arbitrary, capricious, manifestly unreasonable, or improperly motivated.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.