State v. Dannebohm’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
January 2022
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Katz v. United States · Spinelli v. United States · Rakas v. Illinois · Jones v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“defendants must establish that they have a subjective expectation of privacy in the area searched and this expectation must be objectively reasonable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Scheuerman“are personal, and defendants may not vicariously assert them.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Scheuerman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.