Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 421 Pa. Super. 311 - Commonwealth v. Soboleski

421 Pa. Super. 311 - Commonwealth v. Soboleski’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
February 2015
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently February 2015

14 state decisions

60199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McKnight v. Commonwealth · 352 Pa. Super. 36 - Commonwealth v. Gamber · 348 Pa. Super. 589 - Commonwealth v. Reagan · 264 Pa. Super. 414 - Commonwealth v. Herstine · Commonwealth v. Magwood

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a fine of not less than $200 nor more than $1,000 or to imprisonment for not more than six months, or both.” 75 Pa.C.S. § 6503. Pursuant to section 106(c) of the Crimes Code, a fine of up to $1000 and/or imprisonment of up to six months alters the grade of the offense, from a summary offense to a misdemeanor of the third degree. See 18 Pa.C.S. § 106(c) and (e). However, ... section 6502(c) specifically states that this classification”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Every person convicted of a second or subsequent violation of [Section 3733] shall be sentenced to pay a fine of not less than $200 nor more than $1,000 or to imprisonment for not more than six months, or both....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.